Make money. Love one woman. Travel

Tiberiu Stanescu

love-money-travel

Those who say that love is “only love” are wrong. Those who say that money is “just money” are definitely wrong. Those who think that a flight can’t change a life haven’t used a plane ticket properly. There are things which, when inexperienced, are difficult to conceive or to comprehend. If tomorrow is the same as today, you’ll remain the same limited person. But when change happens, then you will experience true growth, and possibly double or triple your current potential. Outside of your daily routine, or your so called “comfort zone” lay hidden treasures for those who dare to adventure.

There are examples which are so clear, that it’s almost like you can see your life in the palm of your hand. You love, you live. You have money, you exist. You travel, now you are living and existing. It’s not madness to seek a perfect model of a life full of beautiful adventures, or a quiet one with a family which you love and care about. For most of us, that model is somewhere in the middle, not living to survive, but also not forgetting to put up a fight once in a while. Humans live to solve problems.

If you’re a man. Like thousands of other men, you probably seek tomorrow to be even better than today. Enough money to get you by comfortably until the end of the month, a girl who sincerely loves you and a life that give you the perfect compromise between love and necessity. You will find compromise at 20, 30 and even 40 years, but each time it will be different. You will realize that your life, the good and the bad, is the sum of a bunch of lines, which represent experiences. After each relationship, draw the line. After each job, and after each bump in the road you will find another line drawn. Is it fair to make conclusions, wrong to do them often. Eventually, you think how it would of been otherwise. Then you probably blame yourself (or others) and might even give up in some aspects. Don’t do it.

Men are perpetually trying to understand what binds women to materialism. But the answer is simple: nothing. Women aren’t materialistic but have a innate desire for safety and sustainability, you are that support. Before throwing arguments my way, I will tell you that I believe in sharing, giving up 50/50 in a relationship, but my 50% is different than hers. Beyond her 50%, it’s all you, accept it and get to work. Imagine that tomorrow she comes in with a positive pregnancy test. Then what? In general, arguments which have to do with a relationship are mostly about pride and ego. Fight your own ego before bringing it up at the relationship. It’s our worst enemy. For everything else, money will answer all your sustainability questions.

Women. You may find them at times so naive, and other too strong. But never uninteresting. Yeah, sure, you have loved, and your instinct tell you that you could love again. But beyond the interest and pleasure of seeing a woman as a lady and a mistress, the time comes when you might see her as wife. And as a mother. And as a friend. Now think about whether they deserved all the years of searching for the “right man” and then comes the moment, you realize that yes, they deserved it, because they have found you. Now we understand that the past is one person’s gift and the future is the destiny of two people who become one. You love her and understand that … it couldn’t be anyone else but her in your life.

If we look at a man’s life over the years, we realize that his whole life is a journey. The most beautiful moment is when you take your time, with patience, and realize that you are next to the one person, the one you love. So there you have it, without drama, be the master of your life. Handle failures and shortcomings as a man, as everyone will experience them. Work smart, not hard. Do one thing at a time. Travel the world, learn who you are, and the ideal person you can become. Build memories, and remember them when you are old.

Life is one. Don’t search for life’s limits. Make money. Love one woman. Travel.

It’s still likely to die in a nuclear apocalypse

Tiberiu Stanescu

Today, 23 years after the official end of the Cold War, organized tours in families nuclear missile silos abolished in ten states in America. Maybe more. A guide explains to visitors that here, in this room, Air Force missile monitored each containing a 1.3 megaton warhead able to incinerate everything within a radius of 10 kilometers. The Delta-01 facility in South Dakota, children can become junior border rocket with a badge and everything.

An analysis made in 200 8 Engineering Professor Martin E. Hellman Stanford estimated that these junior guards currently living with a 10% risk of dying from a nuclear weapon. It’s a game of Russian roulette with ten rooms, he said. Of course, many of the silos are empty now, which is great, but the world there are still 16,000 active nuclear weapons.

In a recent analysis, Seth Baum, CEO of Global Catastrophic Risk Institute has researched what are the chances accidentally start a nuclear war between Russia and the United States. Depending on the assumptions made, the chances took 1 to 100. But the risk of start of such a war is much higher if we take into account other countries besides Russia and the United States.

So young guards will not die of heart disease or cancer, but vaporization or incineration or radiation poisoning, bleeding and cognitive imbalance. Were more likely to die from it than death in a car accident (1 in 112) or cancer (not normally induced by radiation), the rate is about 1 in 7.

IMAGE

Baum’s analysis based on mathematical modeling frameworks constructed by schemes or Poisson processes, used as input information about nuclear accidents or near-misses “warning systems available information about the incidents that took place and other factors to estimate the probability of a crisis between Russia and US rates and false alarm probabilities leaders to launch missiles in response to a false alarm. “the study is based on data collected for the period between 1977 and 1983. In each year there are between 43 and 255 false alarms, most secret.

“The fact that so far there has been no evidence that nuclear war tactics of intimidation works, but I was lucky,” says Baum Bulletin Researchers atom. “If the third officer of the B-59 would be had a different opinion about the launch of the submarine nuclear weapons? If Norwegian rocket incident could have happened during a crisis between the US and Russia? If India and Pakistan would be resolved quickly so the Kargil conflict? It happens often crashes . ”

“In 2013, during a brief period in the United States threatened to intervene militarily in Syria, Israel launched missile to its coastal Mediterranean to test missile defense system,” Baum continues. “Russian radars have launch detected. Israel has cleared the confusion before something bad happens and nuclear weapons have not played any role in the incident. But that kind of danger demonstrates that we are every day. ”

Hellman’s 2008 analysis stems from anti-nuclear site called defusing Threat Nucl eare, which launched a petition to Congress encouraging visitors to fund a study to examine in detail the nuclear threat. Man has a mission.

The buttons are now launching worldwide, including both sides of the conflict in India / Pakistan. And then there are North Korea, China, Israel, France and Britain. All armed to the teeth for the apocalypse. Then there are the terrorist organizations. The chances of a terrorist nuclear attack launched over the next ten years 50-50.

Hellman’s analysis using probabilistic risk analysis to arrive at this conclusion disturbing and analysis that inform partly Baum’s latest study. In particular, Hellman analyzes the failure rate of nuclear deterrence. Basically, the whole structure stability of nuclear weapons is based on the fear of potential aggressors themselves not to fly in the air and fear of the reaction of other countries. But give misfire systems for many reasons – accidents, instability, sabotage, provocation – and tactical nuclear deterrent which saved us before annihilation is no exception.

Hellman allows a failure rate of 0.1 percent per year, or one percent per decade. Hence the risk of 10 percent. As noted in the study, prefer a failure rate of one percent per year, although it is claimed less. That would be a risk of 10 percent a decade and 50 percent in five decades. By comparison, the failure rate associated with an asteroid hitting the Earth is approximately .000001 percent per year.

Perversely nuclear weapons is a facilitator of peace, but that does not mean it’s stable. Eric Schlosser cataloged admirable history events approximation water turned into nuclear accidents in the Guardian last week.

The situation now is much worse than that from the moment Hellman’s report. There is also Iran, but US relations Russia is the limit. Send US anti-missile systems in Eastern Europe and Russia tests new generation nuclear weapons. And if America will continue its clockwise direction until 2016, will have a president can really fool who will guide the world into a new era nuclear super dangerous.